Unwittingly, CNN provided a moment of narrative-shattering clarity as the network’s reliable stable of liberal pundits was reminded that history didn’t actually begin the day Donald Trump took office.

During a heated panel discussion, host Abby Phillip and commentator Ashley Allison attempted to pin the “warmonger” label on President Trump, suggesting his aggressive posture toward the Iranian regime—and his apparent support for the Iranians’ desire for freedom—amounted to starting a new conflict.

The panel, which included Foreign Policy editor Ravi Agrawal, journalist Elise Labott, and conservative radio host Jason Rantz, was descending into the usual media hand-wringing over “regime change” and “parsing language.” Phillip and Allison were busy clutching their pearls over Trump’s suggestion that the Iranian people should rise up, with Allison demanding to know if the U.S. was “at war.”

Then came Kian Tajbakhsh.

Tajbakhsh isn’t some ivory-tower academic theorizing from a D.C. coffee shop; he is an Iranian-American scholar who was actually imprisoned by the brutal mullahs in Tehran. When the CNN hosts tried to frame Trump as the aggressor, Tajbakhsh stepped in to provide a much-needed reality check that left the set momentarily stunned.

“I don’t think it’s right to say that President Trump has started a war with Iran,” Tajbakhsh stated calmly. “I think President Trump wants to finish a war that Iran started in 1979.”

He didn’t stop there. He recounted a chilling anecdote from 2004 while he was working at a high level within Iran. A senior official in the Foreign Ministry looked him in the eye and told him point-blank: “We believe we are at war with the United States.”

For the Left, the fiction that the Islamic Republic is a rational actor—one that was “peaceful” until Trump arrived—is a necessary component of their worldview. Tajbakhsh’s testimony destroyed that facade. He reminded the audience that the regime has been waging a “cold war” against America for nearly 50 years, fueled by the same “death to America” ideology that has defined them since the embassy hostage crisis.

While the media elites worry about the “brutality” of a social media post, Tajbakhsh pointed out the actual brutality: an unarmed, disorganized Iranian citizenry facing a regime so lopsided in its power that they cannot overthrow it alone.

Trump isn’t starting a fire; he’s finally acknowledging the one that’s been burning since 1979—and he’s looking for the extinguisher.

​[#item_full_content]  

​[[{“value”:”

Unwittingly, CNN provided a moment of narrative-shattering clarity as the network’s reliable stable of liberal pundits was reminded that history didn’t actually begin the day Donald Trump took office.

During a heated panel discussion, host Abby Phillip and commentator Ashley Allison attempted to pin the “warmonger” label on President Trump, suggesting his aggressive posture toward the Iranian regime—and his apparent support for the Iranians’ desire for freedom—amounted to starting a new conflict.

The panel, which included Foreign Policy editor Ravi Agrawal, journalist Elise Labott, and conservative radio host Jason Rantz, was descending into the usual media hand-wringing over “regime change” and “parsing language.” Phillip and Allison were busy clutching their pearls over Trump’s suggestion that the Iranian people should rise up, with Allison demanding to know if the U.S. was “at war.”

Then came Kian Tajbakhsh.

Tajbakhsh isn’t some ivory-tower academic theorizing from a D.C. coffee shop; he is an Iranian-American scholar who was actually imprisoned by the brutal mullahs in Tehran. When the CNN hosts tried to frame Trump as the aggressor, Tajbakhsh stepped in to provide a much-needed reality check that left the set momentarily stunned.

“I don’t think it’s right to say that President Trump has started a war with Iran,” Tajbakhsh stated calmly. “I think President Trump wants to finish a war that Iran started in 1979.”

He didn’t stop there. He recounted a chilling anecdote from 2004 while he was working at a high level within Iran. A senior official in the Foreign Ministry looked him in the eye and told him point-blank: “We believe we are at war with the United States.”

For the Left, the fiction that the Islamic Republic is a rational actor—one that was “peaceful” until Trump arrived—is a necessary component of their worldview. Tajbakhsh’s testimony destroyed that facade. He reminded the audience that the regime has been waging a “cold war” against America for nearly 50 years, fueled by the same “death to America” ideology that has defined them since the embassy hostage crisis.

While the media elites worry about the “brutality” of a social media post, Tajbakhsh pointed out the actual brutality: an unarmed, disorganized Iranian citizenry facing a regime so lopsided in its power that they cannot overthrow it alone.

Trump isn’t starting a fire; he’s finally acknowledging the one that’s been burning since 1979—and he’s looking for the extinguisher.

“}]] 

 

conservative signal

Sign up to receive our newsletter

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.